Efficient Use of Paper Rule (A.M. No. 11-9-4-SC)

Republic of the Philippines
Supreme Court

A.M. No. 11-9-4-SC


Whereas, to produce 500 reams of paper, twenty trees are cut and 100,000 liters of water are used, water that is no longer reusable because it is laden with chemicals and is just released to the environment to poison our rivers and seas;

Whereas, there is a need to cut the judicial system’s use excessive quantities of costly paper, save our forests, avoid landslides, and mitigate the worsening effects of climate change that the world is experiencing;

Whereas, the judiciary can play a big part in saving our trees, conserving precious water and helping mother earth;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Supreme Court En Banc hereby issues and promulgates the following:

Sec. 1. Title of the Rule– This rule shall be known and cited as the Efficient Use of Paper Rule.

Sec. 2. Applicability. – This rule shall apply to all courts and quasi-judicial bodies under the administrative supervision of the Supreme Court.

Sec. 3. Format and Style. – a) All pleadings, motions and similar papers intended for the court and quasi-judicial body’s consideration and action (court-bound papers) shall written in single space with one-and-a –half space between paragraphs, using an easily readable font style of the party’s choice, of 14-size font, and on a 13 –inch by 8.5- inch white bond paper; and

b) All decisions, resolutions and orders issued by courts and quasi-judicial bodies under the administrative supervision of the Supreme Court shall comply with these requirements. Similarly covered are the reports submitted to the courts and transcripts of stenographic notes.

Sec. 4. Margins and Prints .— The parties shall maintain the following margins on all court-bound papers: a left hand margin of 1.5 inches from the edge; an upper margin of 1.2 inches from the edge; a right hand margin of 1.0 inch from the edge; and a lower margin of 1.0 inch from the edge. Every page must be consecutively numbered.

Sec. 5.  Copies to be filed. – Unless otherwise directed by the court, the number of court- bound papers that a party is required or desires to file shall be as follows:

a. In the Supreme Court, one original (properly marked) and four copies, unless the case is referred to the Court En Banc, in which event, the parties shall file ten additional copies. For the En Banc, the parties need to submit only two sets of annexes, one attached to the original and an extra copy. For the Division, the parties need to submit also two sets of annexes, one attached to the original and an extra copy. All members of the Court shall share the extra copies of annexes in the interest of economy of paper.

Parties to cases before the Supreme Court are further required, on voluntary basis for the first six months following the effectivity of this Rule and compulsorily afterwards unless the period is extended, to submit, simultaneously with their court-bound papers, soft copies of the same and their annexes (the latter in PDF format) either by email to the Court’s e-mail address or by compact disc (CD). This requirement is in preparation for the eventual establishment of an e-filing paperless system in the judiciary.

b. In the Court of Appeals and the Sandiganbayan, one original (properly marked) and two copies with their annexes;

c. In the Court of Tax Appeals, one original (properly marked) and two copies with annexes. On appeal to the En Banc, one Original (properly marked) and eight copies with annexes; and

d. In other courts, one original (properly marked) with the stated annexes attached to it.

Sec. 6. Annexes Served on Adverse Party. – A party required by the rules to serve a copy of his court-bound on the adverse party need not enclose copies of those annexes that based on the record of the court such party already has in his possession. In the event a party requests a set of the annexes actually filed with the court, the part who filed the paper shall comply with the request within five days from receipt.

Sec. 7. Date of Effectivity. – This rule shall take effect on January 1, 2013 after publication in two newspapers of general circulation in the Philippines.

Manila, November 13, 2012.

3 thoughts on “Efficient Use of Paper Rule (A.M. No. 11-9-4-SC)

  1. Pingback: The Efficient Use of Paper Rule (A.M. No. 11-9-4-SC) | AttyAtWork.com

  2. Prahar

    I am a Nepali ciltizen and while applying for medical residency in the philipines Children hospital ..the training coordinater mailed me as….
    I am Dr. Moses de Guzman from the Office of Professional Education and Training of the Philippine Children’s Medical Center. Your inquiry regarding Residency Training in Pediatric Medicine for foreign nationals was forwarded to our office. Please be informed that foreign applicants must coordinate with United Asia Pacific Trading and Services who will process your application. You may get in touch with them at their office: 5th floor, Bhattachan Complex Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal.

    Thank you for considering the Philippine Children’s Medical Center.

    Moses C. de Guzman III, MD
    Training Coordinator
    Office of Professional Education and Training?
    Philippine Children’s Medical Center

    While inquiry in the consultancy ..they asked me for 25000 $..Same in Rizal medical centre.
    The are illegally selling medical seats of government college for up ta 50000$…Please check the corruption and also provide me justice.

  3. shammy

    I would like to ask something because my wife is in correctional institution for women,she was being convicted of the case section 5 and sec 11 of RA 9516 anti illegal drugs,she was sentenced 12-14 years and a life imprisonment,i would like to know how to make her case be visibly gone by,i mean she`s innocent,how can she have her freedom.? The court of appeals said that she was efficient use of paper rules.? How long does it need to process.?


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *