<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Philippine e-Legal Forum &#187; Family and Property Law</title>
	<atom:link href="/blog/category/family-estate-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://jlp-law.com/blog</link>
	<description>Philippine laws and legal system (JLP-Law blog)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 05:57:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Anti-Bullying Act of 2013 (Republic Act 10627)</title>
		<link>https://jlp-law.com/blog/anti-bullying-act-of-2013-republic-act-10627/</link>
		<comments>https://jlp-law.com/blog/anti-bullying-act-of-2013-republic-act-10627/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 15:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jlp]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family and Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obiter/News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Bullying Act of 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republic Act 10627]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jlp-law.com/blog/?p=1897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[REPUBLIC ACT NO. 10627 AN ACT REQUIRING ALL ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS TO ADOPT POLICIES TO PREVENT AND ADDRESS THE ACTS OF BULLYING IN THEIR INSTITUTIONS SECTION 1. Short Title. – This Act shall be known as the “Anti-Bullying Act of 2013”. SEC. 2. Acts of Bullying. – For purposes of this Act, “bullying” shall [&#8230;]<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://jlp-law.com/blog/anti-bullying-act-of-2013-republic-act-10627/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rule on Violence Against Women and their Children (A.M. No. 04-10-11-SC)</title>
		<link>https://jlp-law.com/blog/rule-on-violence-against-women-and-their-children-a-m-no-04-10-11-sc/</link>
		<comments>https://jlp-law.com/blog/rule-on-violence-against-women-and-their-children-a-m-no-04-10-11-sc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jlp]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family and Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A.M. No. 04-10-11-SC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republic Act 9262]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule on Violence Against Women and their Children]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jlp-law.com/blog/?p=1833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EN BANC A.M. No. 04-10-11-SC RE: RULE ON VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN AND THEIR CHILDREN RESOLUTION Acting on the report of the Committee on Revision of the Rules of Court submitting for this Court&#8217;s consideration and approval the Proposed Rule on Violence Against Women and Their Children, the Court Resolved to APPROVE the same. The Rule [&#8230;]<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://jlp-law.com/blog/rule-on-violence-against-women-and-their-children-a-m-no-04-10-11-sc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prescription of Actions for Annulment in the Philippines (and Who may File Action)</title>
		<link>https://jlp-law.com/blog/prescription-of-actions-for-annulment-in-the-philippines-and-who-may-file-action/</link>
		<comments>https://jlp-law.com/blog/prescription-of-actions-for-annulment-in-the-philippines-and-who-may-file-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 01:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jlp]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Annulment and Legal Separation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annulment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[declaration of nullity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impotence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insanity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parental consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jlp-law.com/blog/?p=1472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A petition for annulment may be denied for a number of reasons. We&#8217;ve already discussed certain defenses, one of which is the expiration of the prescriptive period within which the petition should have been filed. A prescriptive period simply means that the petition based on a particular ground can no longer be filed beyond a [&#8230;]<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://jlp-law.com/blog/prescription-of-actions-for-annulment-in-the-philippines-and-who-may-file-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Annulment in the Philippines: Questions and Answers (Part 5): Overseas Filipinos Edition</title>
		<link>https://jlp-law.com/blog/annulment-in-the-philippines-questions-and-answers-part-5-overseas-filipinos-edition/</link>
		<comments>https://jlp-law.com/blog/annulment-in-the-philippines-questions-and-answers-part-5-overseas-filipinos-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atty. Fred]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Annulment and Legal Separation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[annulment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OFW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Overseas Filipinos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jlp-law.com/blog/?p=1395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We already have four installments on this topic (refer to Part I, Part II, Part III , Part IV), as well as related posts on annulment, legal separation, declaration of nullity and divorce. We&#8217;re trying to cope with the numerous questions raised, but with our schedules, it&#8217;s impractical to answer the questions one by one. [&#8230;]<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://jlp-law.com/blog/annulment-in-the-philippines-questions-and-answers-part-5-overseas-filipinos-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A brief discussion on Infidelity, Concubinage, Adultery and Bigamy</title>
		<link>https://jlp-law.com/blog/a-brief-discussion-on-infidelity-concubinage-adultery-and-bigamy/</link>
		<comments>https://jlp-law.com/blog/a-brief-discussion-on-infidelity-concubinage-adultery-and-bigamy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atty. Fred]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Annulment and Legal Separation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family and Property Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jlp-law.com/blog/?p=981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We previously noted that infidelity is not, by itself, a ground for annulment, although it could be a basis for legal separation or filing a case for adultery/concubinage. As to custody, the Supreme Court already ruled that sexual infidelity, by itself, is not sufficient to grant custody over a child. Let&#8217;s continue the discussion on [&#8230;]<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://jlp-law.com/blog/a-brief-discussion-on-infidelity-concubinage-adultery-and-bigamy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dam Operator liable for Negligence in Flooding</title>
		<link>https://jlp-law.com/blog/dam-operator-liable-for-negligence-in-flooding/</link>
		<comments>https://jlp-law.com/blog/dam-operator-liable-for-negligence-in-flooding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 10:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jlp]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate and Investments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family and Property Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jlp-law.com/blog/?p=940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recent flooding recently caused by the heavy rainfall brought by Typhoons Ondoy and Pepeng has caused tremendous damage to life and property. Also recently, there are threats to sue the dam operators who were allegedly negligent in releasing water too late and without sufficient warning. This brings to mind the old case of National [&#8230;]<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://jlp-law.com/blog/dam-operator-liable-for-negligence-in-flooding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Annulment in the Philippines: Questions and Answers (Part 4)</title>
		<link>https://jlp-law.com/blog/annulment-in-the-philippines-questions-and-answers-part-4/</link>
		<comments>https://jlp-law.com/blog/annulment-in-the-philippines-questions-and-answers-part-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atty. Fred]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Annulment and Legal Separation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jlp-law.com/blog/?p=913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is part of the continuing installment of discussions on annulment or declaration of nullity. We cannot answer each question because of certain limitations. Related questions are lumped and discussed in general. Before posting a question, kindly search the related articles in this site. Otherwise, please be patient and wait for future discussions that may [&#8230;]<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://jlp-law.com/blog/annulment-in-the-philippines-questions-and-answers-part-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lack of parental consent or parental advice: Effect on validity of marriage</title>
		<link>https://jlp-law.com/blog/lack-of-parental-consent-or-parental-advice-validity-of-marriage/</link>
		<comments>https://jlp-law.com/blog/lack-of-parental-consent-or-parental-advice-validity-of-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 01:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atty. Fred]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Annulment and Legal Separation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jlp-law.com/blog/?p=912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was 20 years old when I got married, but my parents didn&#8217;t know that I was married. Is my marriage valid? A number of discussions, through the comments in various posts, center on the validity of marriage without the knowledge or consent of parents. Let&#8217;s have a general discussion on this one. Can I [&#8230;]<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://jlp-law.com/blog/lack-of-parental-consent-or-parental-advice-validity-of-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thoughtless Extravagance in times of Acute Public Want</title>
		<link>https://jlp-law.com/blog/thoughtless-extravagance-in-times-of-acute-public-want/</link>
		<comments>https://jlp-law.com/blog/thoughtless-extravagance-in-times-of-acute-public-want/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 06:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atty. Fred]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family and Property Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jlp-law.com/blog/?p=906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2008, Baguio City suspended the issuance of permits for motorcades along its roads, citing the a Civil Code provision against splurging during critical times. In 2002, a court in Nueva Vizcaya issued a &#8220;temporary restraining order (TRO) preventing the Sangguniang Panlalawigan members from buying 13 luxury vehicles&#8221; for their own individual use, citing the [&#8230;]<div class='yarpp-related-rss yarpp-related-none'>

No related posts.
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://jlp-law.com/blog/thoughtless-extravagance-in-times-of-acute-public-want/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act of 2003 (RA 9208): A Primer</title>
		<link>https://jlp-law.com/blog/anti-trafficking-in-persons-act-of-2003-ra-9208-a-primer/</link>
		<comments>https://jlp-law.com/blog/anti-trafficking-in-persons-act-of-2003-ra-9208-a-primer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 03:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atty. Fred]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family and Property Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://jlp-law.com/blog/?p=904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(A recent news article warns foreigners from marrying Filipino women in exchange for their kidneys or other organs. Two laws were cited: the law against mail-order brides and Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act of 2003. Since we already have a previous discussion on the prohibition against mail-order brides, let&#8217;s have a brief discussion on Republic Act [&#8230;]<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href='/blog/prohibition-against-mail-order-brides/' rel='bookmark' title='Prohibition against Mail-Order Brides'>Prohibition against Mail-Order Brides</a></li>
</ol>
</div>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://jlp-law.com/blog/anti-trafficking-in-persons-act-of-2003-ra-9208-a-primer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
