<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: People&#8217;s Initiative: No sufficient enabling law to amend the Constitution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jlp-law.com/blog/peoples-initiative-enabling-law-amend-constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jlp-law.com/blog/peoples-initiative-enabling-law-amend-constitution/</link>
	<description>Philippine laws and legal system (JLP-Law blog)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 06:08:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Change a Constitution at Philippine e-Legal Forum</title>
		<link>http://jlp-law.com/blog/peoples-initiative-enabling-law-amend-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-11945</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Change a Constitution at Philippine e-Legal Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 09:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jlp-law.com/blog/peoples-initiative-enabling-law-amend-constitution/#comment-11945</guid>
		<description>[...] Defensor-Santiago vs. COMELEC; Lambino vs. COMELEC; Gonzales vs. COMELEC; Sanidad vs. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Defensor-Santiago vs. COMELEC; Lambino vs. COMELEC; Gonzales vs. COMELEC; Sanidad vs. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republic Act 6735 now sufficient? at Atty-at-Work</title>
		<link>http://jlp-law.com/blog/peoples-initiative-enabling-law-amend-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-8108</link>
		<dc:creator>Republic Act 6735 now sufficient? at Atty-at-Work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 05:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jlp-law.com/blog/peoples-initiative-enabling-law-amend-constitution/#comment-8108</guid>
		<description>[...] Now, does this single sentence constitute a reversal of the ruling in Santiago vs. COMELEC that RA 6735 (also known as the &#8220;People&#8217;s Initiative and Referendum Ac&#8221;) is Ã¢â‚¬Å“incomplete, inadequate, or wanting in essential terms and conditions insofar as initiative on amendments to the Constitution is concernedÃ¢â‚¬Â? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now, does this single sentence constitute a reversal of the ruling in Santiago vs. COMELEC that RA 6735 (also known as the &#8220;People&#8217;s Initiative and Referendum Ac&#8221;) is Ã¢â‚¬Å“incomplete, inadequate, or wanting in essential terms and conditions insofar as initiative on amendments to the Constitution is concernedÃ¢â‚¬Â? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Santiago vs. Comelec - will the Supreme Court overturn its decision? at Atty-at-Work</title>
		<link>http://jlp-law.com/blog/peoples-initiative-enabling-law-amend-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-8098</link>
		<dc:creator>Santiago vs. Comelec - will the Supreme Court overturn its decision? at Atty-at-Work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 04:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jlp-law.com/blog/peoples-initiative-enabling-law-amend-constitution/#comment-8098</guid>
		<description>[...] (Original post: 31 March 2006; update - Lambino petition for people&#8217;s initiative dismissed) In Santiago vs. COMELEC, the Supreme Court ruled that Republic Act No. 6735, also known as the &#8220;People&#8217;s Initiative and Referendum Act&#8221;, is Ã¢â‚¬Å“incomplete, inadequate, or wanting in essential terms and conditions insofar as initiative on amendments to the Constitution is concerned.Ã¢â‚¬Â This decision was affirmed in the subsequent case of PIRMA vs. Comelec. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Original post: 31 March 2006; update &#8211; Lambino petition for people&#8217;s initiative dismissed) In Santiago vs. COMELEC, the Supreme Court ruled that Republic Act No. 6735, also known as the &#8220;People&#8217;s Initiative and Referendum Act&#8221;, is Ã¢â‚¬Å“incomplete, inadequate, or wanting in essential terms and conditions insofar as initiative on amendments to the Constitution is concerned.Ã¢â‚¬Â This decision was affirmed in the subsequent case of PIRMA vs. Comelec. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Legislative Department at Philippine e-Legal Forum</title>
		<link>http://jlp-law.com/blog/peoples-initiative-enabling-law-amend-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-8012</link>
		<dc:creator>The Legislative Department at Philippine e-Legal Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jlp-law.com/blog/peoples-initiative-enabling-law-amend-constitution/#comment-8012</guid>
		<description>[...] Section 31. No law granting a title of royalty or nobility shall be enacted.  Section 32. The Congress shall, as early as possible, provide for a system of initiative and referendum, and the exceptions therefrom, whereby the people can directly propose and enact laws or approve or reject any act or law or part thereof passed by the Congress or local legislative body after the registration of a petition therefor signed by at least ten per centum of the total number of registered voters, of which every legislative district must be represented by at least three per centum of the registered voters thereof.  Technorati Tags: 1987 Constitution, Philippine Constitution, philippinesShare and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Section 31. No law granting a title of royalty or nobility shall be enacted.  Section 32. The Congress shall, as early as possible, provide for a system of initiative and referendum, and the exceptions therefrom, whereby the people can directly propose and enact laws or approve or reject any act or law or part thereof passed by the Congress or local legislative body after the registration of a petition therefor signed by at least ten per centum of the total number of registered voters, of which every legislative district must be represented by at least three per centum of the registered voters thereof.  Technorati Tags: 1987 Constitution, Philippine Constitution, philippinesShare and Enjoy:These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philippine e-Legal Forum &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lambino, et al. vs. COMELEC (G.R. No. 174153, 25 October 2006) - Digest</title>
		<link>http://jlp-law.com/blog/peoples-initiative-enabling-law-amend-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Philippine e-Legal Forum &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Lambino, et al. vs. COMELEC (G.R. No. 174153, 25 October 2006) - Digest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 15:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jlp-law.com/blog/peoples-initiative-enabling-law-amend-constitution/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>[...] The COMELEC, however, denied due course to the petition for lack of an enabling law governing initiative petitions to amend the Constitution, pursuant to the Supreme Courtâ€™s ruling in Santiago vs. Commission on Elections. The Lambino Group elevated the matter to the Supreme Court, which also threw out the petition. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The COMELEC, however, denied due course to the petition for lack of an enabling law governing initiative petitions to amend the Constitution, pursuant to the Supreme Courtâ€™s ruling in Santiago vs. Commission on Elections. The Lambino Group elevated the matter to the Supreme Court, which also threw out the petition. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philippine e-Legal Forum &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Amendments and Revisions</title>
		<link>http://jlp-law.com/blog/peoples-initiative-enabling-law-amend-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Philippine e-Legal Forum &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Amendments and Revisions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 10:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jlp-law.com/blog/peoples-initiative-enabling-law-amend-constitution/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>[...] The Congress shall provide for the implementation of the exercise of this right. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Congress shall provide for the implementation of the exercise of this right. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
