Comments on: People of the Philippines vs. Joseph Ejercito Estrada, et al. (Sandiganbayan, Criminal Case No. 26558 [for Plunder], 12 September 2007) http://jlp-law.com/blog/people-philippines-vs-joseph-estrada-sandiganbayan-criminal-case-26558-plunder/ Philippine laws and legal system (JLP-Law blog) Tue, 22 May 2012 07:08:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: wilsontdejesus http://jlp-law.com/blog/people-philippines-vs-joseph-estrada-sandiganbayan-criminal-case-26558-plunder/comment-page-1/#comment-10420 wilsontdejesus Sun, 02 Dec 2007 09:52:43 +0000 http://jlp-law.com/blog/people-philippines-vs-joseph-estrada-sandiganbayan-criminal-case-26558-plunder/#comment-10420 This is regarding the motion to quash of Estrada. Does the added portion in the writ of execution go beyond the decision of the Supreme Court? For in his motion to quash, they are claiming that the added portion pertains to money awards provided for in section 9 of rule 39, rules of court, does not apply to forfeiture proceedings. This is regarding the motion to quash of Estrada. Does the added portion in the writ of execution go beyond the decision of the Supreme Court? For in his motion to quash, they are claiming that the added portion pertains to money awards provided for in section 9 of rule 39, rules of court, does not apply to forfeiture proceedings.

]]>