<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Legal blogs cited in court decisions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jlp-law.com/blog/legal-blogs-blawgs-cited-court-decisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jlp-law.com/blog/legal-blogs-blawgs-cited-court-decisions/</link>
	<description>Philippine laws and legal system (JLP-Law blog)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:27:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://jlp-law.com/blog/legal-blogs-blawgs-cited-court-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 07:47:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jlp-law.com/blog/legal-blogs-blawgs-cited-court-decisions/#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Dean, thank you for bringing it up. While the Philippine Commentary is not strictly a blawg, a lot of your articles deal with legal matters (all insightful, I may add). This is precisely the reason why I asked for your permission to reprint some of your articles in this Forum - for instance, &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://jlp-law.com/blog/special-court-oversee-anti-terror-law/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a special court to oversee the anti-terror law.&lt;/a&gt;

Still, I look forward to the day when a court decision makes reference to the blog, citing the url or linking to it. Hopefully, the ponente will discover that a particular article is printed both on paper and in a blog. If (or when?) the blog is cited, rather than or together with the newspaper article, then we will know that serious blogs and bloggers are taken seriously by the court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dean, thank you for bringing it up. While the Philippine Commentary is not strictly a blawg, a lot of your articles deal with legal matters (all insightful, I may add). This is precisely the reason why I asked for your permission to reprint some of your articles in this Forum &#8211; for instance, <a rel="nofollow" href="http://jlp-law.com/blog/special-court-oversee-anti-terror-law/" rel="nofollow">a special court to oversee the anti-terror law.</a></p>
<p>Still, I look forward to the day when a court decision makes reference to the blog, citing the url or linking to it. Hopefully, the ponente will discover that a particular article is printed both on paper and in a blog. If (or when?) the blog is cited, rather than or together with the newspaper article, then we will know that serious blogs and bloggers are taken seriously by the court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJB</title>
		<link>http://jlp-law.com/blog/legal-blogs-blawgs-cited-court-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>DJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jlp-law.com/blog/legal-blogs-blawgs-cited-court-decisions/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Philippine Commentary is not really a BLAWG, but modesty aside, the Philippine Supreme Court cited a blog post of mine (that was also printed in PDI) in its decision invalidating the Comelec contract for Automated Counting Machines. See Footnote 54 of Panganiban&#039;s ponencia in&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.supremecourt.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2004/jan2004/159139.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ITF  vs. Comelec(Jan 13 2004)&lt;/a&gt;where he quotes the article. I posted about this recently:&lt;a href=&quot;http://philippinecommentary.blogspot.com/2006/01/was-2004-election-automation-junked.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philippine Commentary is not really a BLAWG, but modesty aside, the Philippine Supreme Court cited a blog post of mine (that was also printed in PDI) in its decision invalidating the Comelec contract for Automated Counting Machines. See Footnote 54 of Panganiban&#8217;s ponencia in<a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov.ph/jurisprudence/2004/jan2004/159139.htm" rel="nofollow">ITF  vs. Comelec(Jan 13 2004)</a>where he quotes the article. I posted about this recently:<a href="http://philippinecommentary.blogspot.com/2006/01/was-2004-election-automation-junked.html" rel="nofollow">here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

