<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Law Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jlp-law.com/blog/law-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jlp-law.com/blog/law-blog/</link>
	<description>Philippine laws and legal system (JLP-Law blog)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 09:49:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Sources and Legal Blogs in Court Decisions at Atty-at-Work</title>
		<link>http://jlp-law.com/blog/law-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-11520</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Sources and Legal Blogs in Court Decisions at Atty-at-Work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 04:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jlp-law.com/blog/?p=4#comment-11520</guid>
		<description>[...] Law blogs, referred to as &#8220;blawgs&#8221; by some, are being cited in court decisions in the U.S. (to the cyber-challenged, the term “blog” is a contraction of the words “web log”). As reflected in a collection of court cases that cite legal blogs, there are 32 citations of legal blogs from 27 different cases in the United States, with 8 legal blogs being cited (as of 6 August 2006). 3L Epiphany notes that: As already mentioned, legal blogging allows for post-citation commentary about the very case that cited the blog. Furthermore, a blog can enable interested readers to discuss the opinion in the comments. At the time of this (3L Epiphany) blog post, the post at the Volokh Conspiracy discussing Harper has 45 comments. The original post, the one cited by the Harper dissent (from the denial of rehearing en banc), now has 258 comments. A court citation to a legal blog thus allows readers of the blog to discuss the decision both on the original (cited) post and in subsequent posts about the case. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Law blogs, referred to as &#8220;blawgs&#8221; by some, are being cited in court decisions in the U.S. (to the cyber-challenged, the term “blog” is a contraction of the words “web log”). As reflected in a collection of court cases that cite legal blogs, there are 32 citations of legal blogs from 27 different cases in the United States, with 8 legal blogs being cited (as of 6 August 2006). 3L Epiphany notes that: As already mentioned, legal blogging allows for post-citation commentary about the very case that cited the blog. Furthermore, a blog can enable interested readers to discuss the opinion in the comments. At the time of this (3L Epiphany) blog post, the post at the Volokh Conspiracy discussing Harper has 45 comments. The original post, the one cited by the Harper dissent (from the denial of rehearing en banc), now has 258 comments. A court citation to a legal blog thus allows readers of the blog to discuss the decision both on the original (cited) post and in subsequent posts about the case. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Sources and Legal Blogs in Court Decisions &#124; Atty-at-Work</title>
		<link>http://jlp-law.com/blog/law-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-11080</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Sources and Legal Blogs in Court Decisions &#124; Atty-at-Work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 08:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jlp-law.com/blog/?p=4#comment-11080</guid>
		<description>[...] Law blogs, referred to as &#8220;blawgs&#8221; by some, are being cited in court decisions in the U.S. (to the cyber-challenged, the term â€œblogâ€ is a contraction of the words â€œweb logâ€). As reflected in a collection of court cases that cite legal blogs, there are 32 citations of legal blogs from 27 different cases in the United States, with 8 legal blogs being cited (as of 6 August 2006). 3L Epiphany notes that: As already mentioned, legal blogging allows for post-citation commentary about the very case that cited the blog. Furthermore, a blog can enable interested readers to discuss the opinion in the comments. At the time of this (3L Epiphany) blog post, the post at the Volokh Conspiracy discussing Harper has 45 comments. The original post, the one cited by the Harper dissent (from the denial of rehearing en banc), now has 258 comments. A court citation to a legal blog thus allows readers of the blog to discuss the decision both on the original (cited) post and in subsequent posts about the case. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Law blogs, referred to as &#8220;blawgs&#8221; by some, are being cited in court decisions in the U.S. (to the cyber-challenged, the term â€œblogâ€ is a contraction of the words â€œweb logâ€). As reflected in a collection of court cases that cite legal blogs, there are 32 citations of legal blogs from 27 different cases in the United States, with 8 legal blogs being cited (as of 6 August 2006). 3L Epiphany notes that: As already mentioned, legal blogging allows for post-citation commentary about the very case that cited the blog. Furthermore, a blog can enable interested readers to discuss the opinion in the comments. At the time of this (3L Epiphany) blog post, the post at the Volokh Conspiracy discussing Harper has 45 comments. The original post, the one cited by the Harper dissent (from the denial of rehearing en banc), now has 258 comments. A court citation to a legal blog thus allows readers of the blog to discuss the decision both on the original (cited) post and in subsequent posts about the case. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philippine e-Legal Forum &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Legal blogs cited in court decisions</title>
		<link>http://jlp-law.com/blog/law-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Philippine e-Legal Forum &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Legal blogs cited in court decisions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2006 07:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jlp-law.com/blog/?p=4#comment-39</guid>
		<description>[...] Legal blogs, referred to as &#8220;blaws&#8221; by some, are being cited in court decisions in the U.S. As reflected in a collection of court cases that cite legal blogs, there are 32 citations of legal blogs from 27 different cases, with 8 legal blogs being cited (as of 6 August 2006).  3L Epiphany notes that: As already mentioned, legal blogging allows for post-citation commentary about the very case that cited the blog. Furthermore, a blog can enable interested readers to discuss the opinion in the comments. At the time of this (3L Epiphany) blog post, the post at the Volokh Conspiracy discussing Harper has 45 comments. The original post, the one cited by the Harper dissent (from the denial of rehearing en banc), now has 258 comments. A court citation to a legal blog thus allows readers of the blog to discuss the decision both on the original (cited) post and in subsequent posts about the case. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Legal blogs, referred to as &#8220;blaws&#8221; by some, are being cited in court decisions in the U.S. As reflected in a collection of court cases that cite legal blogs, there are 32 citations of legal blogs from 27 different cases, with 8 legal blogs being cited (as of 6 August 2006).  3L Epiphany notes that: As already mentioned, legal blogging allows for post-citation commentary about the very case that cited the blog. Furthermore, a blog can enable interested readers to discuss the opinion in the comments. At the time of this (3L Epiphany) blog post, the post at the Volokh Conspiracy discussing Harper has 45 comments. The original post, the one cited by the Harper dissent (from the denial of rehearing en banc), now has 258 comments. A court citation to a legal blog thus allows readers of the blog to discuss the decision both on the original (cited) post and in subsequent posts about the case. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jean fernandez</title>
		<link>http://jlp-law.com/blog/law-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>jean fernandez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 15:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jlp-law.com/blog/?p=4#comment-9</guid>
		<description>what will happen to a public official accused of bigamy if he is found guilty?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what will happen to a public official accused of bigamy if he is found guilty?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philippine e-Legal Forum &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GOT CAUSE?</title>
		<link>http://jlp-law.com/blog/law-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Philippine e-Legal Forum &#187; Blog Archive &#187; GOT CAUSE?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 00:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jlp-law.com/blog/?p=4#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] (This entry was posted by Judge Don Navarro at his site and reproduced here with his express permission.Â  The insight of Judge Navarro on a Law Blog is noteworthy: &#8220;We should bring the law to the people. The law, after all is for THEM, not just lawyers and judges. It would be good to present the law in a form that can be understood by them, that&#8217;s why we have all these plain language initiatives, and a blog is a great way to do that.&#8221;) &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (This entry was posted by Judge Don Navarro at his site and reproduced here with his express permission.Â  The insight of Judge Navarro on a Law Blog is noteworthy: &#8220;We should bring the law to the people. The law, after all is for THEM, not just lawyers and judges. It would be good to present the law in a form that can be understood by them, that&#8217;s why we have all these plain language initiatives, and a blog is a great way to do that.&#8221;) &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

