Comments for Philippine e-Legal Forum http://jlp-law.com/blog Philippine laws and legal system (JLP-Law blog) Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:27:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on Annulment in the Philippines: Questions and Answers (Part 5): Overseas Filipinos Edition by k.walker http://jlp-law.com/blog/annulment-in-the-philippines-questions-and-answers-part-5-overseas-filipinos-edition/comment-page-2/#comment-21973 k.walker Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:27:09 +0000 http://jlp-law.com/blog/?p=1395#comment-21973 Hi! Atty, I wonder if you could help me with my questions. 1994 I was married to a guy who forced me by saying he is not going to let me leave the country without marrying him. We have 2 kids and he is a drug addict shabu user until now, so I am afraid when he said he will kill my kids if I don't marry him before leaving the country. So I did! just to make sure I can scape from him and I endorsed my kids to my parents. Supported the kids financially every month. While working abroad I met my new husband the following year and we are now married for 16 years with 2 children as well! Now the question is my first husband is not after me but my mother and my siblings are black mailing me! I am now living in US and has green card. Is there's a chance my mother and siblings can just create trouble for me while I am abroad? Please let me know as they are really nasty influential people! I have invested a lot in Philippines and end up nothing they took it all and leave my kids without. Please help me answer this question! Thanks a lot in advance! Hi! Atty,
I wonder if you could help me with my questions.
1994 I was married to a guy who forced me by saying he is not going to let me leave the country without marrying him. We have 2 kids and he is a drug addict shabu user until now, so I am afraid when he said he will kill my kids if I don’t marry him before leaving the country. So I did! just to make sure I can scape from him and I endorsed my kids to my parents. Supported the kids financially every month. While working abroad I met my new husband the following year and we are now married for 16 years with 2 children as well!

Now the question is my first husband is not after me but my mother and my siblings are black mailing me! I am now living in US and has green card. Is there’s a chance my mother and siblings can just create trouble for me while I am abroad? Please let me know as they are really nasty influential people! I have invested a lot in Philippines and end up nothing they took it all and leave my kids without. Please help me answer this question! Thanks a lot in advance!

]]> Comment on Annulment in the Philippines: Questions and Answers (Part 3) by Bianca1984 http://jlp-law.com/blog/annulment-in-the-philippines-questions-and-answers-qa-part-3/comment-page-6/#comment-21972 Bianca1984 Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:27:04 +0000 http://jlp-law.com/blog/annulment-in-the-philippines-questions-and-answers-qa-part-3/#comment-21972 Hi, I just want to ask about my marriage status.. We got married last 2008 without the concent of his parents upon checking sa NSO it was been registered. After our marriage hindi po kami nagsama ng asawa ko. Recently lang po kami nagsama sa iisang bubongand this time alam narin po ng parents nya. Kaso lang po marami po kaming misunderstandings and lagi po kami talagang nag aaway. Dumating po sa point na nagkakasakitan na kami. Everytime we argue lagi nya pong sinasabi na maghiwalay na kami. This time po kasi parang hindi ko na po talaga kayang tiisin yung pananakit nya physically,emotionaly and sa tingin ko po I am mentaly abused narin dahil lagi lagi po niyang sinasabi na maghiwalay nalang kami. Meron po akong anak bago kami nagpaksal, pero sa ngayon po yung bata naka apelyido po sa kanya. TAnong ko lang po anu po kaya and pwedeng grounds para maghiwalay na kami. Kasi po Hindi na po talga nag wowrk out yung marriage namin and hindi narin po yata healthy na nagaaway kami lagi. Wala po kaming sariling anak dahil sa hindi rin po namin malamang dahilan hindi parin kami nagkakaroon. Wala naman din pong 3rd party both side. Pero yun nga po it seems hindi na talaga kami nagkakaintindihan. Natatakot po kasi ako na baka pag hindi pa kami naghiwalay mas lalo lang po kami mag away at humatong po sa hindi magandang resulta. I am 28 years old and He is 32. Hi, I just want to ask about my marriage status.. We got married last 2008 without the concent of his parents upon checking sa NSO it was been registered. After our marriage hindi po kami nagsama ng asawa ko. Recently lang po kami nagsama sa iisang bubongand this time alam narin po ng parents nya. Kaso lang po marami po kaming misunderstandings and lagi po kami talagang nag aaway. Dumating po sa point na nagkakasakitan na kami. Everytime we argue lagi nya pong sinasabi na maghiwalay na kami. This time po kasi parang hindi ko na po talaga kayang tiisin yung pananakit nya physically,emotionaly and sa tingin ko po I am mentaly abused narin dahil lagi lagi po niyang sinasabi na maghiwalay nalang kami. Meron po akong anak bago kami nagpaksal, pero sa ngayon po yung bata naka apelyido po sa kanya. TAnong ko lang po anu po kaya and pwedeng grounds para maghiwalay na kami. Kasi po Hindi na po talga nag wowrk out yung marriage namin and hindi narin po yata healthy na nagaaway kami lagi. Wala po kaming sariling anak dahil sa hindi rin po namin malamang dahilan hindi parin kami nagkakaroon. Wala naman din pong 3rd party both side. Pero yun nga po it seems hindi na talaga kami nagkakaintindihan. Natatakot po kasi ako na baka pag hindi pa kami naghiwalay mas lalo lang po kami mag away at humatong po sa hindi magandang resulta. I am 28 years old and He is 32.

]]> Comment on Divorce and Annulment in the Philippines by drizzle http://jlp-law.com/blog/divorce-annulment-philippines/comment-page-10/#comment-21968 drizzle Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:58:12 +0000 http://jlp-law.com/blog/?p=7#comment-21968 I was married abroad year 1997 and went home to phil. and renew our vows in the church year 1998 in spun of 2 yrs & 8mos we lived as husband and wife but i worked abroad again yr 1999 a month after i received a letter informing my husbands infidelity in phil. From then on we had unsettled differences till we had no communication at all. and was totally abandoned marriage until now. No kids, no properties. It's running 13yrs of separation and or abandonment. If i file an annulment will this be enough grounds and how long will it take to be free at all. Please advice. I was married abroad year 1997 and went home to phil. and renew our vows in the church year 1998 in spun of 2 yrs & 8mos we lived as husband and wife but i worked abroad again yr 1999 a month after i received a letter informing my husbands infidelity in phil. From then on we had unsettled differences till we had no communication at all. and was totally abandoned marriage until now. No kids, no properties. It’s running 13yrs of separation and or abandonment.

If i file an annulment will this be enough grounds and how long will it take to be free at all.

Please advice.

]]> Comment on RA 9184 or The Government Procurement Reform Act of 2003: Boon or Bane? by kevin http://jlp-law.com/blog/ra-9184-or-the-government-procurement-reform-act-of-2003-boon-or-bane/comment-page-1/#comment-21964 kevin Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:35:48 +0000 http://jlp-law.com/blog/ra-9184-or-the-government-procurement-reform-act-of-2003-boon-or-bane/#comment-21964 my question is our company is the exclusive distributor of the said product which has trade secrets and patents, we've been delivering the said products since 2009 after winning the bidding and complying all the requirements needed to be eligeble, and suddenly by the last quarter of december 2011, we simply found out that there was other company not known to our principal who were awarded by the BAC to deliver the said products. my question is do we have the right to retrieve the products from the other party? can we retrieve the products or intercept the products from delivery if not yet being receive and sign by the end user even if the said product was already in the establishment where the product shall be used? do we have the right to fight for this? my question is our company is the exclusive distributor of the said product which has trade secrets and patents, we’ve been delivering the said products since 2009 after winning the bidding and complying all the requirements needed to be eligeble, and suddenly by the last quarter of december 2011, we simply found out that there was other company not known to our principal who were awarded by the BAC to deliver the said products. my question is do we have the right to retrieve the products from the other party? can we retrieve the products or intercept the products from delivery if not yet being receive and sign by the end user even if the said product was already in the establishment where the product shall be used?

do we have the right to fight for this?

]]> Comment on Rule on declaration of absolute nullity of void mariages and annulment of voidable marriages by shiessay http://jlp-law.com/blog/rule-on-declaration-of-absolute-nullity-of-void-mariages-and-annulment-of-voidable-marriages/comment-page-2/#comment-21962 shiessay Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:40:07 +0000 http://jlp-law.com/blog/rule-on-declaration-of-absolute-nullity-of-void-mariages-and-annulment-of-voidable-marriages/#comment-21962 I would like to ask. I am the second wife. My husband filed an annulment before the second marriage. He got the decision of nullity sometime in November 1999. He is not aware that copies should be provided to nso. He got also the Certificate of Finality which needed to be filed to nso as well. In year 2000, we got married knowing that his previous marriage had been annulled. The marriage was registered to NSO. My husband went to US for work. we had a child. In year 2006, i went to nso in Manila to get a copy of his previous marriage's license and found out that in Manila, he is still legally married to his wife because the cert of finality wasnot registered. Is our marriage in 2000 valid or not? Is my husband considered single up to now? do we need to remarry? I would like to ask. I am the second wife. My husband filed an annulment before the second marriage. He got the decision of nullity sometime in November 1999. He is not aware that copies should be provided to nso. He got also the Certificate of Finality which needed to be filed to nso as well. In year 2000, we got married knowing that his previous marriage had been annulled. The marriage was registered to NSO. My husband went to US for work. we had a child. In year 2006, i went to nso in Manila to get a copy of his previous marriage’s license and found out that in Manila, he is still legally married to his wife because the cert of finality wasnot registered. Is our marriage in 2000 valid or not? Is my husband considered single up to now? do we need to remarry?

]]> Comment on Branches of the Philippine Government: Separation of Powers by arias_louie http://jlp-law.com/blog/branches-of-the-philippine-government-separation-of-powers/comment-page-1/#comment-21959 arias_louie Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:07:12 +0000 http://jlp-law.com/blog/branches-of-the-philippine-government-separation-of-powers/#comment-21959 "The Judiciary may not have the power of the sword, may not have the power of the purse, but it has the power to interpret the Constitution" A very dangerous doctrine.... Sa pag-iinterpret kasi sa ating Constitution. Ang equivalent nito ay: a.) Lawmaking - Gumagawa ka ng Batas Sole duties and functions dapat ng Legislative Branch. Hindi ng Judicial Branch. b.) Amendments - binabago mo ang mga nakasulat o probisyon sa ating Constitution. Sole duties and functions dapat ng Constitutional Convention (Con Con or Constitutional Assembly (Con Ass) Delegates. Hindi ng Judicial Branch. Ganito tuloy yung nangyari.... 1.) Ni-legalized nito ang appointment ni then Associate Justice Renato Corona as Chief Justice ng ating Supreme Court. Kahit na ito ay labag sa ating 1987 Constitution ARTICLE VII Section 15 "Two months immediately before the next presidential elections and up to the end of his term, a President or Acting President shall not make appointments, except temporary appointments to executive positions when continued vacancies therein will prejudice public service or endanger public safety." 2.) Sinang-ayunan o inaprobahan nito ang pagkakaroon ng panibagong Distrito ng Camarines Sur para lang maging Congressman ang anak ni Gloria Macapagal Arroyo na si Dato Arroyo. Kahit na hindi umabot ang Distrito nito sa at least 250,000 Population na nakasaad sa ating 1987 Constitution ARTICLE VI Section 5. (3) "Each legislative district shall comprise, as far as practicable, contiguous, compact, and adjacent territory. Each city with a population of at least two hundred fifty thousand, or each province, shall have at least one representative." 3.) Ang hindi nito pagsunod sa nakasulat o probisyon sa ating 1987 Constitution ARTICLE XI Section 17 "A public officer or employee shall, upon assumption of office and as often thereafter as may be required by law, submit a declaration under oath of his assets, liabilities, and net worth. In the case of the President, the Vice-President, the Members of the Cabinet, the Congress, the Supreme Court, the Constitutional Commissions and other constitutional offices, and officers of the armed forces with general or flag rank, the declaration shall be disclosed to the public in the manner provided by law." REPUBLIC ACT NO. 6713 Section 8 of RA 6713, also known as the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees. Kaya panukala ko.... Kapag natuloy yung pagbabago sa ating Constitution o Charter Change. Bago ma-ratified by a majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite ang ating magiging Constitution. Ibigay na dapat ang Interpretation nito. - Interpretation sa lahat ng mga nakasulat o probisyon sa ating Constitution. At ang mangyari sa ating Judiciary.... Taga- apply na lamang ito sa Interpretation ng mga nakasulat o probisyon sa ating Constitution. Hindi na ito mag-interpret. Kasi nga may Interpretation na. Kasi iba yung Interpretation ng ating Judiciary (Supreme Court) sa Interpretation ng mga Framers ng ating 1987 Constitution. At mas tama ang Interpretation ng ng mga Framers ng ating 1987 Constitution kaysa sa ating Judiciary (Supreme Court). Syempre sila yung nakaisip, sa kanila galing yung idea at yung mga nakasulat sa ating 1987 Constitution. Syempre sila (Framers) yung tama. At paara mawala na rin ang kalituhan sa kung ano talaga ang interpretation ng mga nakasulat o probisyon sa ating Constitution At hindi na rin maulit yung nangyayari na "NA NAG-A-ACT O UMAAKTO NA "MAS BATAS" O "ABOVE" PA SA ATING CONSTITUTION ANG ATING JUDICIARY (SUPREME COURT).... NA YUNG EN BANC RULING O DESISYON NITO AY MAS BATAS O ABOVE PA SA NAKASULAT O PROBISYON SA ATING CONSTITUTION". Gusto ko rin baguhin ang Theory ni Montesquieu - "Separation of state powers: executive; legislative; judicial" Di ba sa Theory ni Montesquieu Executive Who implement or execute the law. Legislative Who make, pass, and repeal the law. Judicial Who interprets and applies the law. Sa akin naman.... Executive Who implement or execute the law. Legislative Who make and pass the law. But before it became the law. It should be Interpreted. Also it can repeal the law Judicial Who applies the interpretation of the law. (Yun lang... Thanks for reading. To God alone be all the Glory sa naisip ko. Dahil binigyan Niya ako ng Wisdom at Idea. To Reform our Constitution. Especially sa pag-reform sa Separation of powers ng ating Government) ^_^ “The Judiciary may not have the power of the sword, may not have the power of the purse, but it has the power to interpret the Constitution”

A very dangerous doctrine….

Sa pag-iinterpret kasi sa ating Constitution. Ang equivalent nito ay:

a.) Lawmaking – Gumagawa ka ng Batas

Sole duties and functions dapat ng Legislative Branch. Hindi ng Judicial Branch.

b.) Amendments – binabago mo ang mga nakasulat o probisyon sa ating Constitution.

Sole duties and functions dapat ng Constitutional Convention (Con Con or Constitutional Assembly (Con Ass) Delegates. Hindi ng Judicial Branch.

Ganito tuloy yung nangyari….

1.) Ni-legalized nito ang appointment ni then Associate Justice Renato Corona as Chief Justice ng ating Supreme Court.

Kahit na ito ay labag sa ating 1987 Constitution ARTICLE VII Section 15

“Two months immediately before the next presidential elections and up to the end of his term, a President or Acting President shall not make appointments, except temporary appointments to executive positions when continued vacancies therein will prejudice public service or endanger public safety.”

2.) Sinang-ayunan o inaprobahan nito ang pagkakaroon ng panibagong Distrito ng Camarines Sur para lang maging Congressman ang anak ni Gloria Macapagal Arroyo na si Dato Arroyo.

Kahit na hindi umabot ang Distrito nito sa at least 250,000 Population na nakasaad sa ating 1987 Constitution ARTICLE VI Section 5. (3)

“Each legislative district shall comprise, as far as practicable, contiguous, compact, and adjacent territory. Each city with a population of at least two hundred fifty thousand, or each province, shall have at least one representative.”

3.) Ang hindi nito pagsunod sa nakasulat o probisyon sa ating 1987 Constitution ARTICLE XI Section 17

“A public officer or employee shall, upon assumption of office and as often thereafter as may be required by law, submit a declaration under oath of his assets, liabilities, and net worth. In the case of the President, the Vice-President, the Members of the Cabinet, the Congress, the Supreme Court, the Constitutional Commissions and other constitutional offices, and officers of the armed forces with general or flag rank, the declaration shall be disclosed to the public in the manner provided by law.”

REPUBLIC ACT NO. 6713

Section 8 of RA 6713, also known as the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees.

Kaya panukala ko….

Kapag natuloy yung pagbabago sa ating Constitution o Charter Change.

Bago ma-ratified by a majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite ang ating magiging Constitution.

Ibigay na dapat ang Interpretation nito.

- Interpretation sa lahat ng mga nakasulat o probisyon sa ating Constitution.

At ang mangyari sa ating Judiciary….

Taga- apply na lamang ito sa Interpretation ng mga nakasulat o probisyon sa ating Constitution.

Hindi na ito mag-interpret. Kasi nga may Interpretation na.

Kasi iba yung Interpretation ng ating Judiciary (Supreme Court) sa Interpretation ng mga Framers ng ating 1987 Constitution.

At mas tama ang Interpretation ng ng mga Framers ng ating 1987 Constitution kaysa sa ating Judiciary (Supreme Court).

Syempre sila yung nakaisip, sa kanila galing yung idea at yung mga nakasulat sa ating 1987 Constitution.

Syempre sila (Framers) yung tama.

At paara mawala na rin ang kalituhan sa kung ano talaga ang interpretation ng mga nakasulat o probisyon sa ating Constitution

At hindi na rin maulit yung nangyayari na “NA NAG-A-ACT O UMAAKTO NA “MAS BATAS” O “ABOVE” PA SA ATING CONSTITUTION ANG ATING JUDICIARY (SUPREME COURT)….

NA YUNG EN BANC RULING O DESISYON NITO AY MAS BATAS O ABOVE PA SA NAKASULAT O PROBISYON SA ATING CONSTITUTION”.

Gusto ko rin baguhin ang Theory ni Montesquieu

- “Separation of state powers: executive; legislative; judicial”

Di ba sa Theory ni Montesquieu

Executive

Who implement or execute the law.

Legislative

Who make, pass, and repeal the law.

Judicial

Who interprets and applies the law.

Sa akin naman….

Executive

Who implement or execute the law.

Legislative

Who make and pass the law. But before it became the law. It should be Interpreted.

Also it can repeal the law

Judicial

Who applies the interpretation of the law.

(Yun lang… Thanks for reading. To God alone be all the Glory sa naisip ko. Dahil binigyan Niya ako ng Wisdom at Idea. To Reform our Constitution. Especially sa pag-reform sa Separation of powers ng ating Government)

^_^

]]> Comment on Prescription of Actions for Annulment in the Philippines (and Who may File Action) by Mench http://jlp-law.com/blog/prescription-of-actions-for-annulment-in-the-philippines-and-who-may-file-action/comment-page-1/#comment-21955 Mench Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:44:03 +0000 http://jlp-law.com/blog/?p=1472#comment-21955 Dear Atty, Thank God I found this site and I pray you will be able to help me with my queries regarding my annulment case. I filed my annulment 2008 as NONE APPEARANCE before I went back working in Thailand as a caregiver..the following year, it was declared ''annuled'' BUT the problem arise when I was about to register it in the place (Florida Blanca, Pamp) where I had my ''church wedding'', when the Civil Registrar said he cannot register it because only the ''church wedding'' was annuled and nothing was declared/stated about my ''civil wedding''..he said, there should be a decision on both rights (church and civil).. I went back to the person whom I entrusted the filing of my case and she said because I did not submit any evidence about my civil marriage..Granted, that I did not submit..In the first place, she did not tell me to do so and though I did not submit any legal papers, there was an attachment INFO on the side of my ''Marriage Contract''stating there that I was married in civil rights on this date and year...so why then, they did not see this?...I was asked to submit all legal papers regarding my civil wedding..After I complied with all the necessary requirements,she submitted it again in RTC Branch 7 in Paniqui, Tarlac for ammendment but I was told that I will have to wait because the Judge is on vacation that time..I waited, ok ! but up to this time, I got NO ANSWER..The last time I talked to the person I entrusted my case, she said I was the cause of the delay and that she wanted me to go personally in Paniqui to inquire because she was busy herself..WHY, ME?..i don't even know anyone there, besides, I entrusted her to work on it ..I paid everything she asked me to pay and this is what I got...I waited for the longest time..I have been separated for 10 yrs now and I believe I have the right for my own happiness since my x husband already has his own family with 3 grown up kids in which his eldest was even older than my youngest daughter, only to prove that he was already having an affair even during our own marriage. Please help me ATTY..I am no longer working and I was just an ordinary servant of God in JIL..I spent almost my earnings to get my annulment and until now I haven't got my case done..I will appreciate your kind office in whatever help you can extend to me. Thanks and Godbless....Mench Dear Atty,
Thank God I found this site and I pray you will be able to help me with my queries regarding my annulment case.

I filed my annulment 2008 as NONE APPEARANCE before I went back working in Thailand as a caregiver..the following year, it was declared ”annuled” BUT the problem arise when I was about to register it in the place (Florida Blanca, Pamp) where I had my ”church wedding”, when the Civil Registrar said he cannot register it because only the ”church wedding” was annuled and nothing was declared/stated about my ”civil wedding”..he said, there should be a decision on both rights (church and civil)..
I went back to the person whom I entrusted the filing of my case and she said because I did not submit any evidence about my civil marriage..Granted, that I did not submit..In the first place, she did not tell me to do so and though I did not submit any legal papers, there was an attachment INFO on the side of my ”Marriage Contract”stating there that I was married in civil rights on this date and year…so why then, they did not see this?…I was asked to submit all legal papers regarding my civil wedding..After I complied with all the necessary requirements,she submitted it again in RTC Branch 7 in Paniqui, Tarlac for ammendment but I was told that I will have to wait because the Judge is on vacation that time..I waited, ok ! but up to this time, I got NO ANSWER..The last time I talked to the person I entrusted my case, she said I was the cause of the delay and that she wanted me to go personally in Paniqui to inquire because she was busy herself..WHY, ME?..i don’t even know anyone there, besides, I entrusted her to work on it ..I paid everything she asked me to pay and this is what I got…I waited for the longest time..I have been separated for 10 yrs now and I believe I have the right for my own happiness since my x husband already has his own family with 3 grown up kids in which his eldest was even older than my youngest daughter, only to prove that he was already having an affair even during our own marriage.
Please help me ATTY..I am no longer working and I was just an ordinary servant of God in JIL..I spent almost my earnings to get my annulment and until now I haven’t got my case done..I will appreciate your kind office in whatever help you can extend to me.
Thanks and Godbless….Mench

]]> Comment on Prescription of Actions for Annulment in the Philippines (and Who may File Action) by tere1121 http://jlp-law.com/blog/prescription-of-actions-for-annulment-in-the-philippines-and-who-may-file-action/comment-page-1/#comment-21946 tere1121 Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:45:07 +0000 http://jlp-law.com/blog/?p=1472#comment-21946 Dear Atty, Good day!!! My boyfriend who is separated from his wife has already filed a annulement case. they were married at the church. if the the said case will be granted...can i and my bf be married at the church? thank you and More power Dear Atty,

Good day!!! My boyfriend who is separated from his wife has already filed a annulement case. they were married at the church. if the the said case will be granted…can i and my bf be married at the church? thank you and More power

]]> Comment on Common-law marriage (live-in relationships) in the Philippines by TULONG: Problemang Live-in http://jlp-law.com/blog/common-law-marriage-live-in-relationships-in-philippines/comment-page-2/#comment-21942 TULONG: Problemang Live-in Tue, 31 Jan 2012 11:04:14 +0000 http://jlp-law.com/blog/common-law-marriage-live-in-relationships-in-philippines/#comment-21942 [...] more: Common-law marriage (live-in relationships) in the Philippines at Philippine e-Legal Forum [...] [...] more: Common-law marriage (live-in relationships) in the Philippines at Philippine e-Legal Forum [...]

]]> Comment on Legal Support for the Child and R.A. 9262 by lhyn_1983 http://jlp-law.com/blog/legal-support-child-ra-9262/comment-page-4/#comment-21941 lhyn_1983 Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:28:00 +0000 http://jlp-law.com/blog/legal-support-child-ra-9262/#comment-21941 good day sir!! im married who work in a shuttle company as a driver.with having 2kids age 8and 6 yrs old they live with me and hiwalay ako sa husband ko for more than 2yrs already.i dnt have work now im asking for support from him lumapit po ako sa isang abugado at binigyan nya po me ng latter for the company where my husband working and it send also to my husband but they ignored me.my lawyer say i expend 30thou for a case agains my husband so i dnt have tht much money i stop.now im suffering financially problem as i dnt have work. pls..help me po.thnk u more power for ur program... god bless!!! good day sir!!
im married who work in a shuttle company as a driver.with having 2kids age 8and 6 yrs old they live with me and hiwalay ako sa husband ko for more than 2yrs already.i dnt have work now im asking for support from him lumapit po ako sa isang abugado at binigyan nya po me ng latter for the company where my husband working and it send also to my husband but they ignored me.my lawyer say i expend 30thou for a case agains my husband so i dnt have tht much money i stop.now im suffering financially problem as i dnt have work.
pls..help me po.thnk u
more power for ur program…
god bless!!!

]]>